It should be noted that we are testing the 1GB RAM model of the MangoPi MQ Pro here. UnixBench PHPBench PyBench WavPack Audio Encoding Crypto++ OpenSSL Bench GZIP Compression Memory (RAM) Performance With GZIP, it’s 34.98% faster to complete the same test, OpenSSL benchmarks show around 50% increases across the board and whilst with Crypto++’s Integer and Elliptical curve run the MQ Pro pulls ahead by 31.23%, Keyed and Unkeyed Algorithm runs were 20.73% and 10.91% faster respectively. When we move to GZIP compression, Crypto++ and OpenSSL work though, the Pi Zero W starts to fight back. PyBench also completes 22.26% faster and the WavPack encoding test is 7.43% quicker on the MangoPi board. The Mango Pi MQ Pro under PHPBench testing shows a 50.31% performance increase over the Raspberry Pi Zero W and its compute dominance doesn’t end there. Compute PerformanceĪs always, I’ll start with UnixBench and move on to a mix of “real-world” and other synthetic benchmarks. A 120mm fan is blowing across the board for all tests (unless mentioned) to ensure no thermal throttling takes place. For USB Ethernet, I use the Linksys 1Gbit USB Ethernet adapter. *4Kp30 HDMI output may have limited support in applications Benchmarking Information / Hardwareįor these benchmarks, the boot storage is the best-performing Amazon Basics 64GB microSD card and the SSD is a Samsung 850 EVO (500GB). 1GHz Allwinner D1 C906 RISC-V Processing UnitĤ0 Pin Raspberry Pi compatible GPIO header
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |